Post 10 - Organization of Doc2

My organizational strategy for Doc2 mirrored, for the most part, my strategy for Doc1. I started on paper with an outline: Thesis or statement of what I was writing about, Main Point 1, Main Point 2, ect. I researched anything that I thought would be helpful to my paper. I saved articles I liked then narrowed them down to the ones I used in my paper. I did not write my draft on paper, though. Honestly, I waited until the night before peer review 1 to type it up. What can I say, life happens. My organization is usually all good points. I don't like to do pros and cons or question and answer. 

The only alternative strategy I would use would be pros and cons. I really don't like that idea much. In Doc 2, I'm trying to persuade someone to choose my major. You are pretty much selling them that. If I were selling someone something I wouldn't say "This is great! But sometimes not so great." For example: I'm selling my dirt bike. I tell the buyer it is an awesome ride but at 60 hours on the engine, it's going to need a top end. If I wasn't mechanically inclined or didn't want to put money into it, that statement would make me not want to buy the dirt bike. I guess some people wouldn't mind the pros and cons deal. Those people would be more of the no BS type.